<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR> <BODY> <p>GAF still endorses Eagle's shameful treatment of this GAF consumer, saying that they believe Eagle's rework offer is "fair." I also reported to GAF that the tarpaper on my roof is different from the sample that was given to me. It appears to be of lesser quality and not as wrinkle-resistant as the Shingle-Mate sample. I sent pieces of what is on my roof and a tiny piece of their sample on May 7, 2004.</p> <p>If you are viewing this text, your browser lacks the ability to read frames or iframes. Don't worry; you can still enjoy our site. All the pages can be viewed from the <A href="http://cauc2.net/sitemap.htm" TARGET=_parent >Site Map page</A>. Please come inside!</p> <p>This is also a story about an atrocious roof installed by Eagle Construction. Did the Better Business Bureau, Better Contractor's Bureau, NARI - National Association of the Remodeling Industry, GAF Materials Corporation, or the D&C newspaper do anything to help the consumer? Amy wants to share what she has learned to help other consumers not make the same mistakes she made.</p> <H2>GAF Letters</H2> </body>

GAF's Response of January 11, 2006 (3 pages)

Jan 11, 2006 Response, Page 1 Jan 11, 2006 Response, Page 2 Jan 11, 2006 Response, Attachment

Excerpt from GAF's Response of February 21, 2006 (1 page)

Excerpt from GAF's Response of February 21, 2006

GAF's Response of April 25, 2006 (1 page)

GAF's Response of April 25, 2006

Sample Submission and Proof of Delivery

Sample Submission
Proof of Delivery
Binding Arbitration and Right-to-Cure, Is Your State Next? That is a very real threat!